erica234427 rants...
I bought Sorry For Party Rockin\' and was pretty dissappointed. It wasnt as good as I expected. Oh w ...
HOME FIND MUSIC MEET PEOPLE SEARCH JOIN!
Forgot username or password?
MUSIC NEWS
OTHER STUFF
Beyonce And Jay-Z's Blue Ivy Trademark: An Expert Explains
Posted on 2012-02-10 03:00:13
Artist/band(s): Jay-Z [FB]

musicnews View: Profile - All Posts
Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1678877/beyonce-jay-z-blue-ivy-trademark.jhtml

Couple likely 'trying to protect what they rightfully own or created,' family law expert tells MTV News.By John Mitchell

Jay-Z and BeyoncePhoto: Evan Agostini/ Getty Images

Beyoncé and Jay-Z have filed an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to protect their month-old baby's name and reserve it for future use, MTV News has confirmed. The superstar couple reportedly sought the trademark to stop the use of Blue Ivy's name by others.

It's a smart move, according to family law attorney and author Vikki Ziegler. "[Seeking the trademark] forestalls competitors from using the child's name and or third parties from attempting to sell the baby's name back to the couple," Ziegler told MTV News. "They are likely trying to protect what they rightfully own or created, shall we say, by trademarking Blue Ivy's name."

The application to trademark Blue Ivy Carter's name, filed by BGK Trademark Holdings (Beyoncé's company) is currently pending but will likely be approved because, as the Washington Post reports, parents are legally authorized to trademark the names of their minor children.

"In essence, it's a trademark for a brand, and this brand is expected to be one hot commodity — just look at Blue Ivy's parents," Ziegler said. "Anyone else that tried to use the name after the trademark was approved could be sued and held liable for damages."

While the Patent Office looks fondly on attempts to trademark the name of one's own child, attempts to do the same with the names of other people's kids are another story, as two designers learned when they sought — just days after Blue Ivy's birth — to trademark the baby's name for their own use.

Applications from fashion designer Joseph Mbeh to patent "Blue Ivy Carter NYC" and by an unnamed designer to trademark "Blue Ivy Carter Glory IV" for a fragrance line were denied by the Patent Office, which noted in its decision that the name belonged to a "very famous infant" and consumers would wrongly assume that any products bearing the name had been approved by Beyoncé and Jay-Z.

Ziegler noted that the trademark would "protect against others using the child's name as a brand of merchandise in the same marketplace," so it will not impact the "Blue Ivy" trademark held by a clothing boutique in Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. The store filed to trademark its name on January 19, 2011, a year before Queen B and Jay made the name famous. They received approval on August 23 — five days before Beyoncé announced her pregnancy at the MTV Video Music Awards.

What do you think about Beyoncé and Jay-Z trademarking Blue Ivy's name? Let us know in the comments!

RELATED NEWS

Lawsuit Filed Over Tidal's Royalty Payments
Related Artist/Band(s): Jay-Z [FB] 
Stream Daft Punk And Jay-z's Unreleased Collab Track
Related Artist/Band(s): Daft Punk [FB]  Jay-Z [FB] 
Album Sales Round-up: Week Of July 17th, 2013
Related Artist/Band(s): Jay-Z [FB]  Ciara [FB] 
Jay-z Projected To Move 450-500k Units
Related Artist/Band(s): Jay-Z [FB] 
Stream Jay-z's "dead Presidents Iii"
Related Artist/Band(s): Jay-Z [FB] 
Page -
Page -
AllRespect.com // Beyonce And Jay-Z's Blue Ivy Trademark: An Expert Explains
This site has 2 goals:
  1. Find Music that you will love
  2. Meet People who share your great taste in music
If this sounds like your kinda place, why not join?